Pauline Marois, Quebec's archetypal 'Desperate Woman", insists that Saskatchewan Premier, Brad Wall, is a "Sneaky Weasel" for being so successful.

Ha ha. Poor Pauline Marois. She has become Quebec's archetypal 'Desperate Woman." At least at this point she is keeping her criticism within her Province back to criticising the Liberal leader Couillard. Everyone knows that recently she has been attacking Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, calling him a "sneaky weasel" during a provincial election. HELLO!!?? Ms. Marois??? Anybody home??? Marois, apparently, finds it incredibly 'sneaky' that Brad Wall insists on being such a successful Premier from an economic standpoint. when the Quebec economy, under her leadership, is such a disaster. "How dare he show me up, that sneaky weasel??!!" Incidentally, many fiscally responsible Republican governors in the U.S. are being referred to as "sneaky weasels" by their tax and spend Democrat counterparts, and for largely the same reason. Equally, perhaps if the Progressive Conservative opposition leader in Ontario, Tim Hudak, displayed some of this "sneaky weasel" quality, he might win the next provincial election. http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2014/03/20140325-132630.html

Kathleen "Orville Reddenbacker" Wynne, insists that anyone who criticizes incompetent women leaders must be sexist.

When it comes to Leftards, who shirk personal responsibility like rattlesnakes moult their skins, it is always the other guy's fault. If a growing majority of Americans now regard the incompetent Obama as the worst President in U.S. history it is simply because they are racist. Likewise when the majority of Ontarians jettison Kathleen "Orville Reddenbacker" Wynne and her tax and spend bozos in the spring election and exile her to Pluto, Wynne will accuse Ontarians of being sexist, even the women. Ontarians won't care however because Wynne will be on Pluto via a one way ticket. http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2014/03/20140322-164823.html

Princess Alison Redford, U.N. alumnus, 'nanny state' devotee and entitlement obsessed narcissist, resigns in a dilettante's huff of crocodile tears and self-pity.

Poor Princess Alison Redford. Like the dilettante 'progressive' U.N. alumni that she is in her heart, a 'progressiveness' which is a quality that she, 'underlined' in her resignation speech as desirable in her policies, Redford remains true to form. Like any dilettante she runs away in a huff, after she discovered that the electorate are less than enamored by her 'nanny state' policies and her narcissistic, entitlement obsessed, persona. Good riddance Alison. You were a terrible mistake for leader of a conservative party from the get go.Go into the private sector for a while and work at a real job and put things into perspective. If, after some time toiling among the cinders and ash you become thoroughly chagrined you might actually be able to re-enter public life with some humility and thus have something of value to offer. You might even become a 'real' conservative and thus a loyal Canadian. http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/03/19/alison-redford-resigns-as-premier-of-alberta/

Australian 'carbon capture' technology. An Eco-friendly winner or a tax-payer abusing carbon wet dream?

This sounds like a brilliant idea, at least at first glance. IF the plastic products produced by this 'carbon capture' technology have credible commercial application potential; and IF this plastic produced is biodegradable OR able tor replace plastic products from other sources, for example non-renewables like petroleum; and IF the industrial producers of significant carbon emissions pollution seize upon this technology as a money making pollution control measure while improving their carbon imprint profile; THEN, we may have an Eco-friendly winner on our hands. If on the other hand this 'carbon capture' technology is another one of those 'green' boondoggles like Wind turbines, Solar Panels, Electric cars etc. etc., which are a million miles long on promise and a yard long on delivery; then, we are being confronted with another locus for billions of taxpayers dollars being wasted on a carbon emissions wet dream. After over a decade of 'Green Energy' boondoggles sponsored by the McGuinty/Wynne abomination (government) in Ontario, Canada; which, has literally squandered billions on wind farms only to produce unreliable and unusable energy; and after observing five years of the risible Obama administration in the U.S. wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on 'Green Energy' fiascoes such as Solyndra, you will have to forgive me for remaining highly skeptical. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/video/entrepreneurs-turn-pollution-plastic-181740778.html

Al-Shabab who attacked the West Gate mall in Nairobi, Kenya is evil incarnate operating in the name of a 1400 year old rationalization for evil, Islam.

One day most people will understand what some of us have known for some time. Islam is not a religion as most of us understand religion. Islam is clearly a totalitarian ideology masking itself as a religion. Indeed, there are many now who believe that Islam is the prototype upon which Marx created communism and Hitler created Nazism. The only real functional difference between these two totalitarian monstrosities and Islam is that neither of their creators bothered maintaining the deceit that their ideology was based upon the word of Allah (allegedly God.) Marxism in fact denied God and was the ultimate materialist philosophy based upon the unfolding of materialist forces in the universe and in society which were claimed to be totally independent of God. Nazism on the other hand, was essentially racist in its underpinnings. It was based upon the erroneous assumption of an Aryan master race which was destined to rule the world. Hitler claimed this Aryan master race was in fact the Germanic peoples of the world, blonde and blue-eyed (although he was neither). If there was any religion at all connected with Nazism it was based upon the pagan, pre-Christian gods of German and Norse mythology. He was able for a time to mesmerize a majority of the German population into believing his fantasy, until his prophesied one thousand year Reich collapsed in less than fifteen years. Despite their superficial differences from each other, Islam, Communism, Nazism are functionally almost identical. Anyplace in the world where any one of these three essentially fascists ideologies are in power you find the following similarities. 1. As they are all based upon rather transparent Lies, they are all therefore obligated to maintain police states with secret police and goon squads with which terrorize their populations to keep them under control. 2. There is no real rule of law because their law is arbitrary based upon the whims of the tyrant in charge. One can be charged with an offence on a whim and jailed indefinitely or killed without any hope of legal recourse. 3. There are no enforced codes of human rights because there is no respect for humans who are regarded a mere chattel whose total existence is merely to support the state or the whims of the tyrants. Minority rights do not exist at all and majority rights are still dependent on the whim of the tyrant in charge. 4. Whatever property rights one has are at best ephemeral because they can be negated at the whim of the tyrant. 5. States run by these very similar ideologies generally maintain large standing armies with a very well supplied military which they use at will to intimidate and conquer their weaker neighbours in total disregard for international law. These states all subscribe to the Darwinian contention of 'Survival of the Fittest' to which necessarily follows in their minds that 'Might makes Right.' 6. They are all tyrannies without democracy and without the hope of democracy. Al-Shabab and Al Qaeda and scores of other Islamic extremist groups serve as the avant-garde or cutting edge of Islam and the Islamic ambition to establish a worldwide caliphate (Islamic empire), They are all evil and were always intended to be evil as was the case of the totalitarian ideology from which they take succor and from which they seek excuse and/or rationalization for their evil actions, Islam. Islam, is not like other religions. All other religions, whatever their differences are about God, Islam is about Satan. Allah is not God and never was God. Allah is Satan. http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/09/27/how-an-accountant-with-a-fondness-for-poetry-became-head-of-al-shabab-one-of-worlds-most-wanted-terrorists/

The pro-Muslim Brotherhood Obama s not an honest broker when it comes to a Military intervention in the Syrian conflict.

This post was written in response to Andrew Coyne's recent article for the National Post supporting some kind of intervention by the Obama led U.S. which I took issue with. Mr. Coyne's arguement is a valid one and one made with human compassion which is a great credit to him. The only flaw in his reasoning as far as I can see is that it is still not at all clear, despite Secretary of State John Kerry's assurances, that it was the Bashir Assad regime who were responsible for the use of chemical weapons. It just as easily could have been the rebels in a set-up to garner the sympathies of the West for their cause. Would the rebels slaughter their own people to garner support from the West? You bet they would! Consider who the rebels are. They are Sunni Muslims who are comprised of many elements of Al Qaeda, and more importantly, the granddaddy of all terrorist groups and the organization best equipped to benefit from the fall of Assad, the Muslim Brotherhood. We know from the Muslim Brotherhood's slaughter of Christians and non-compliant Muslims in Egypt what barbarism they are capable of. Assad, on the other hand is an Alawite Muslim which is a sub-sect of the Shiite Muslims which run Iran and also support Assad. Assad is also primarily secular in his governance and is much more supportive of religious minorities, particularly Christians, than the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood would ever be were they to take control of Syria. Furthermore, with the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood in charge in Syria all bets are off as to whether they would keep the peace with Israel. Assad, admittedly, is a brutal dictator make no mistake about that; but, up to the rebellion started by the Sunni extremists two years ago, he was a stable dictator who more or less treated his minorities with equanimity. Should the Muslim Brotherhood controlled rebels ever take over however, Assad’s regime may turn out to have been a walk in the park by comparison. The plot thickens however when you consider Obama's motives for attacking Assad. Obama’s past record suggests he is pro- Sunni Muslim Brotherhood. He himself was also the son of a Sunni Muslim father and he attended a Sunni Muslim mosque in Indonesia as a young child and was brought up during this period to be a Sunni Muslim. Later, in America he attended an allegedly Christian church which was run by a Minister, Reverend Wright, who taught liberation theology, which is as much Marxist as it is Christian. So I am not claiming that Obama is a secret Sunni Muslim now but clearly his attachment to Christianity is tentative at best and that given his early upbringing he has clear memories of and sympathies to Sunni Islam. Consider also that since the beginning of his administration in 2008 that Obama has routinely consulted with representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House via the auspices of their North American front group, ISNA. On ISNA's recommendation he had removed the words, Islam, Islamic, Islamist, Muslim, Mohammedan etc. from all National Security documents pertaining to acts of terror or planned acts of terror. Since 2008, terrorism, if it is called terrorism at all, has become generic with no religious affiliation. A clear example of this bias at work was after Major Nidal Hassan (the Fort Hood shooter) was arrested for gunning down many of his military colleagues while shouting "Allahu Akbar", and he was not charged with Islamic terrorism or even terrorism but merely 'workplace violence". Another example of Obama's Sunni Islam, pro-Muslim Brotherhood bias has been his support for Mohammed Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. During the so-called Arab Spring crisis in Egypt, while Egypt was still controlled by the pro-US, pro-Western military dictator, Hosni Mubarak, who also honored the peace treaty with Israel, Obama, threw Mubarak under the bus despite the advice to the contrary from many security experts and supported the revolution. Who took over after an alleged 'free' election after Mubarak was removed from office, but the well-organized Muslim Brotherhood under Mohammed Morsi? The Sunni Muslim extremist Morsi , as soon as he assumed power, did what the Muslim Brotherhood has always promised to do, he re-wrote the Egyptian constitution and attempted to fully implement the abomination which is Sharia law upon the entire population. Also, under the Sunni Islamic extremist Morsi, the persecution of the Coptic Christian minority in Egypt went up exponentially. When the more moderate Egyptians, secularists and would be democracy advocates protested nationally for weeks against Morsi and his Sunni Muslim extremism, Obama spoke out in support of the ‘democratically’ elected Morsi regime. Then when the military invoked the will of the moderates, arrested Morsi and threw the Muslim Brotherhood out of office and installed a much more moderate interim leader, Obama still came out in support of Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood and threatened again to cut off aid to Egypt, despite the glaring fact that the new leadership was much more pro-Western than Morsi was. Consider also Obama’s hostile relationship to Shiite Iran but friendly relationship to Sunni Saudi Arabia. Keep in mind that it is Saudi Arabia that funds the Wahhabi controlled mosques throughout America, Canada and Western Europe. The particularly virulent form of Islam, Wahabism, which is preached by fanatical imams in these mosques is hostile to the American constitution, the American way of life, Christianity, Judaism and secularism. These extremists (stealth jihadists) are working covertly and sometimes overtly around the clock to change America (and the other Western democracies) and to implement the abomination which is Sharia law. They have also penetrated most American universities and the public school system attempting to promote their supremacist agenda. The Obama administration however continues to look the other way while the slow and steady Muslim Brotherhood takeover of America continues. So, in conclusion, when you consider the imminent attack against the Alawite (Shiite) Assad regime in Syria, in favor of the Sunni Muslim rebels, do you really think that Obama is an honest broker? http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/08/30/andrew-coyne-in-syria-if-all-the-choices-are-bad-you-might-as-well-do-the-right-thing/

Innocent Tourist Amr Kassem just another Goat-Bearded Jihadi.

Yes, yes, the same old politically correct stories are printed by the mainstream media, time and again, to sell us on the myth that our Muslim brethren are just like us. Just loyal Americans or Canadians who are victimized by circumstances. How sad, how touching. Recently, the taxpayer funded C.B.C. (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) served us up their usual dish of pablum and informed us that Amr Kassem, a Canadian permanent resident, who lived in Toronto but was visiting relatives in Egypt when he, uh, 'spontaneouly' decided to join the protests in Alexandria and was allegedly shot by government snipers in the back of the head and killed. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2013/08/17/toronto-resident-killed-egypt-clashes-alexandria.html This article was accompanied with nice family photos of Amr with his Hijab covered wife and infant daughter standing and smiling against the backdrop of a Toronto beach on a beautiful sunny day. Fade to reality. Upon further investigation by blogger Jonathan Halevi and the Toronto Sun it turns out that this 'innocent' family man killed while on vacation in Egypt was nothing of the kind. It turns out that: "Amr Kassem’s Facebook page reveals his radical Islamic political views. Kassem expressed opposition to the Muslim Brotherhood and sided with the even more extremist Islamic Salafi movement. On August 15, a day before he was killed and while in Alexandria Egypt, Kassem changed his Facebook profile picture to the flag of the jihad. In his postings he showed support for the violent protests against the military regime and in one case favored setting fire to the Media Production City building after demonstrating in front of it." "In his answers to Internet surveys Kassem wholeheartedly endorsed the Salafi movement, espoused the implementation of Sharia law and the establishment of the Caliphate and sympathized with Qaeda’s founder Osama Bin Laden, whom he called “Mujahid” (jihad fighter)." http://jonathanhalevi.blogspot.ca/2013/08/canadian-killed-in-egypt-was-salafist.html So much for the moderate and loyal Toronto family man.