Gay C.N.N. Pundit, Sally Kohn understands and sympathizes with gay, black, murderer. Is it his blackness or his gayness that she sympathizes with?

Sally Kohn is a wing nut. I first clued into this when she was, incomprehensibly, a Fox News contributor, on shows like 'Hannity'. She invariably had a fixed, smarmy, superior-to-thou expression on her face, as if it was an undisputed fact that she was the smartest person in the room. That presumption was quickly shattered of course as soon as she opened her mouth and started spouting her loony Left nonsense. I notice that Fox News does not use her services any longer and I cannot for the life of me imagine why. As far as her identifying with and supporting the gay, black, murderer, it is not merely because of his Blackness but it is also because of her Gayness. Sally Kohn is and out-of-the-closet lesbian who is married to a woman. That is her business of course and under normal circumstances it would not be worth mentioning except for the fact that she poses as a pundit and therefore that leaves her open to scrutiny and furthermore it allows one to understand perhaps why she is so quick sympathize with another gay person in trouble. http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/cnns-sally-kohn-excuses-racist-virginia-tv-killer-as-justified-for-murdering-white-reporters/?fb_action_ids=406424342897137&fb_action_types=og.comments

Fox News Contributor Geraldo Rivera, keeps on making threats. Most recently against Donald J. Trump's campaign adviser.

I suppose Fox wants to keeps its well earned reputation of being 'Fair, BALANCED and Unafraid' by keeping liberals on its staff and on its contributor lists. People like Juan Williams, Kirsten Powers, Alan Colmes and Geraldo Rivera, to name but a few. With Messrs. Williams and Colmes as well as Ms. Powers, this works out very well because all three are highly civilized, intelligent and gifted individuals who routinely display self control and can handle a little criticism and can give it back without resorting to threats of violence. Unfortunately with Mr. Rivera recently, he is failing to control his hair trigger temper on places like 'The Five' where he threatened Eric Bolling recently and now this latest incident of threatening Donald J. Trump's campaign adviser. One wonders how much longer the long suffering Roger Ailes, the Fox News CEO, will continue to tolerate Geraldo Rivera's excesses before finally cracking the whip. http://rightwingnews.com/media/geraldo-rivera-threatens-physical-violence-if-donald-trumps-campaign-adviser-visits-fox-news/

Congenital Liar and Closet Muslim, Barack Hussein Obama, fatuously thanks Muslims for their imaginary contributions to America. Where is the laugh track for this hideous joke?

This is pure historical revisionism in action folks. America, historically, was demonstrably a Christian nation even if constitutionally practicing separation of Church and State. The only thing that Islam had to do with a developing America was incidental, due to the preying of the Barbary Pirates (from Islamic North Africa) on the Eastern seaboard of the U.S. after the Revolutionary War. This happened because the 13 Colonies no longer had the British Navy (at that time the dominant navy in world) to protect them. Thus the Americans were obligated to quickly develop their own powerful and effective navy to protect themselves from the Barbary Pirates and other external threats. This was the ONLY (and unintended) contribution that Muslims ever made to America. Any other claims by the closet Muslim, Obama, or any other traitor, is pure historical revisionism. http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2015/05/27/obama-thanks-muslims-for-building-the-very-fabric-of-our-nation/

“Progressive” Liberalism is Collectivism by another name

Liberals are terrified of the strong individual. The strong individual is everything they are not and (in their own minds at least) cannot ever be. Furthermore, what is the polar opposite of the individual to wit, the collective? In reality, it is but a group of individuals. The concept therefore of the collective being a coherent whole is erroneous at best. Any society which wishes to bury the individual into the collective therefore, is much more about the power of those doing the burying than it is about the welfare of the collective. Both the Soviet Politburo and the Politburo of the People's Republic of China are cases in point. In both instances, a privileged group dominated by a strong man, presumes to decide what is desirable for the teeming masses. America, on the other hand, used to be a country which attempted, by rule of law in concert with small government, to provide equality of opportunity for all individuals but never equality of result. To provide equality of result would require reducing everyone to the lowest common denominator which is precisely what the neo-Marxist community organizer Barack Hussein Obama has attempted to do for the last 7 years. Bernie Sanders (and no doubt Hillary) promise to do the same after 2016. Furthermore, only a secular and strictly godless society can proceed thus. For, who did the Lord Jesus come to save? The collective? Or the individual? The collective en masse cannot make a personal choice to accept Christ. It is the individual who chooses to accept or reject the Salvation offered by Jesus Christ. Knowing this, the advocates of the collective like Obama, must attack Christianity because it’s honoring of the individual and individual choice represents the polar opposite of the evil they are trying to achieve.

Tarek Fatah, ostensibly a brave fighter against that false distinction which is called Radical Islam, but who equivocates about the true nature of mainstream Islam. Taqiyya?

There is much of worth to say about Tarek Fatah; but, one should always take him with a grain of salt. He is indeed a decade’s long fighter against radical Islam (Islamofascism) but he insists that what he imagines to be the 'authentic' religion of Islam, its alleged prophet Mohamed and its Holy Book, the Quran, is a genuine religion and it is distinct from radical Islam. This insistence despite the overwhelming evidence of the essentially political and ideological nature of even so-called mainstream Islam as it continues to pose an existential threat to the entire civilized world. Indeed major Islamic leaders and politicians have contradicted Tarek's schizophrenic view of Islam. Recep Erdogan, Turkey's Prime Minister, said that claims about the distinction between radical Islam and mainstream or moderate Islam are at best erroneous. There is only Islam. Keep in mind that Prime Minister Erdogan is a notorious Islamist but he does not equivocate about the nature of Islam and its ultimate agenda. Likewise, President Al Sisi of Egypt, recently addressed Islamic scholars at Al-Azhar University (the epicenter of Sunni Islam scholarship) and called for a major reform of Islamic sacred (so-called) texts. Among other things, Al Sisi said that the “corpus of [Islamic] texts and ideas that we have sacralised over the centuries” are “antagonizing the entire world”; that it is not “possible that 1.6 billion people [reference to the world’s Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants—that is 7 billion—so that they themselves may live”; and that Egypt (or the Islamic world in its entirety) “is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost—and it is being lost by our own hands.” Tarek however continues to deny the essentially radical and corrosive nature of mainstream Islam despite what is common knowledge in the Islamic world. Much like the “Liar-in-Chief”, Barack Hussein Obama. Do we detect a pattern here? Also, as a committed Leftist, Fatah persists in a schizophrenic worldview. He has criticized the Obama administration on many occasions for their pro-Islamist agenda, on the well documented infection of the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House and their effect on foreign policy and the wording of national security documents; but, then, on the other hand, he supported Obama’s Presidency as well as his re-election. Hello? Methinks that our good friend Tarek doth equivocate. He speaks with a forked-tongue. Taqiyya? As a Canadian voter Tarek votes for the NDP which are often to the left of the U.S. Democrats (if that can be believed) and essentially socialistic in their political agenda. The NDP, like the fatuous Obama administration, are also soft on the Islamists and are more inclined to engage and appease Islamic extremism than to fight against it. In conclusion, if you want to hear some hard facts and some valid insights about the nature of that false distinction called radical Islam, Tarek Fatah can be of assistance, but if you are looking for a completely honest, committed and consistent fighter against that deadly malevolence which is mainstream Islam, its true nature and its endemic agenda to overrun the civilized world and drag us all back into darkness, you had better look elsewhere. http://www.therebel.media/tarek_fatah_this_isn_t_about_shia_vs_sunni

Michelle Malkin correctly points out that Obama's weaselly claim that "You didn't built that" is both "historically ignorant and cynically demagogic".

When it comes to getting to where he is through other people's help, Obama literally wrote the book on it. Clearly Obama believes that because he (unlike all other Presidential candidates), was not properly vetted by the sycophantic media; because he was was carried through Harvard and other academic institutions for which he has yet to provide his transcripts; and because his 2008 election and particularly his 2012 re-election (after four years of gross incompetence) was won for him by Senior Strategist David Axelrod, that everyone else is as weak, deceitful and as dependent on others as him. "You didn't build that" was his 2012 campaign slogan. According to Michelle Malkin (whose new book "Who built that?", has become a bestseller), Obama's weaselly claim that "You didn't build that" is both "historically ignorant and cynically demagogic". I cannot agree more. http://www.c-span.org/video/?326060-4/washington-journal-michelle-malkin-built&live

Left wing Australian loons were actually offended because Australian PM, Tony Abbot, called the ISIS Death Cult, A Death Cult. You truly cannot make stuff this absurd up.

I would be attempted to laugh out loud about the absurdity of idiots on the Left actually being offended about ISIS the death cult, being called a death cult, if the existence and the actions of ISIS were not so horrific. Equally, if such absurd and dangerous far Left thinking had not infected Canada and the U.S. as well. Between the demented Left and the psychopathic Islamic terrorists we are truly cursed with an implacable evil in our current time. God help us, or rather, Pray to God, but keep your powder dry. http://www.therebel.media/leftists_offended_after_australian_pm_calls_isis_a_death_cult