Tarek Fatah cannot understand why the West could better resist Communism and Fascism than Islamism

Tarek Fatah posits the rhetorical question: Why was the West better able to resist Communism and Fascism than they are Islamism? He goes on to say that only the Ultra Right are committed to resisting Islamism but they are manipulated into going about it the wrong way and therefore playing into the hands of the Islamists. I would respond to Tarek's comments as follows Today's Islamists have some distinct advantages that other totalitarian ideoloques didnt have. Communist, Nazis, and Fascist ideology were clearly delineated as the purely political entities that they are without much ambiguity whereas Islam/Islamism has been able to creep under the radar for the following reasons. 1. The Islamists have conned many in the West into thinking that Islam is a Religion of Peace, although 1400 years of aggression and two caliphates (Muslim empires) and a third in the making tell a much different story. 2. The Islamists have conned many in the West into accepting that Islam is first and foremost a religion, whereas the facts on the ground tell a different story. Islam, is and has always been first and foremost a totalitarian ideology and a rationalization for invasion and dominance; whereas, spirituality, as Jewish people, Christians, Hindus and Buddhists etc. understand spirituality, is almost incidental to Islam, a mere afterthought. 3. As the West has been conned into accepting Islam as a major religion, they feel obligated according to their own rules of law and codes of human rights, to bend over backwards to appease what is in essence a totalitarian system which is designed to undermine and subsequently dominate all other systems of thought which will invariably include western secular democracies; and, replace them with that pseudo-theological based system of law and government called the Sharia, with the ultimate goal being a third and global caliphate. 4. As the West is currently still beholden to Arab dictatorships for energy they have been lax about controlling the proliferation of Saudi funding throughout North and South America and Western Europe for the building of Wahhabi mosques and university endowments which is spreading Wahhabi/Muslim Brotherhood extremist ideology throughout the Western society at all levels. The current Iranian regime have also invested significantly in the spread of an extreme Shiite version of Islam in the West as well. 5. Finally , as the Wahabbis, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Irainian Shiites are much better heeled financially than the Soviets ever were they can afford to buy off U.S., Canadian and European politicians who otherwise might resist their infiltration of Western governments and educational institutions. As to Tarek's contention that it is the committed Ultra Right who are unwittingly responsible for Islamist infiltration of Western governments and educational institutions because of their being manipulated by the Islamists, I can only respond, that his claim is pure, 100%, Saudi camel dung. The truth of the matter is, putting the 1400 year old tradition, practice and influence of Islamist Taqiyya (rationalized deceit) aside, it is rather the Ultra-Lites, a.k.a. the Western liberals who have allowed the abomination of Islamist infiltration to come about in the name of multiculturalism and political correctness. Curious enough he has said as much himself on many occasions in his never ending condemnation of White liberals for their gullibility and/or cowardice in facing up to the truth of the global Islamist threat. So, make up your mind Tarek, is it the Ultra Right or the Ultra Lites who should be blamed for Islamist infiltration? http://www.facebook.com/tarekfatah/posts/10151933268760012