Congenital Liar and Closet Muslim, Barack Hussein Obama, fatuously thanks Muslims for their imaginary contributions to America. Where is the laugh track for this hideous joke?

This is pure historical revisionism in action folks. America, historically, was demonstrably a Christian nation even if constitutionally practicing separation of Church and State. The only thing that Islam had to do with a developing America was incidental, due to the preying of the Barbary Pirates (from Islamic North Africa) on the Eastern seaboard of the U.S. after the Revolutionary War. This happened because the 13 Colonies no longer had the British Navy (at that time the dominant navy in world) to protect them. Thus the Americans were obligated to quickly develop their own powerful and effective navy to protect themselves from the Barbary Pirates and other external threats. This was the ONLY (and unintended) contribution that Muslims ever made to America. Any other claims by the closet Muslim, Obama, or any other traitor, is pure historical revisionism. http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2015/05/27/obama-thanks-muslims-for-building-the-very-fabric-of-our-nation/

“Progressive” Liberalism is Collectivism by another name

Liberals are terrified of the strong individual. The strong individual is everything they are not and (in their own minds at least) cannot ever be. Furthermore, what is the polar opposite of the individual to wit, the collective? In reality, it is but a group of individuals. The concept therefore of the collective being a coherent whole is erroneous at best. Any society which wishes to bury the individual into the collective therefore, is much more about the power of those doing the burying than it is about the welfare of the collective. Both the Soviet Politburo and the Politburo of the People's Republic of China are cases in point. In both instances, a privileged group dominated by a strong man, presumes to decide what is desirable for the teeming masses. America, on the other hand, used to be a country which attempted, by rule of law in concert with small government, to provide equality of opportunity for all individuals but never equality of result. To provide equality of result would require reducing everyone to the lowest common denominator which is precisely what the neo-Marxist community organizer Barack Hussein Obama has attempted to do for the last 7 years. Bernie Sanders (and no doubt Hillary) promise to do the same after 2016. Furthermore, only a secular and strictly godless society can proceed thus. For, who did the Lord Jesus come to save? The collective? Or the individual? The collective en masse cannot make a personal choice to accept Christ. It is the individual who chooses to accept or reject the Salvation offered by Jesus Christ. Knowing this, the advocates of the collective like Obama, must attack Christianity because it’s honoring of the individual and individual choice represents the polar opposite of the evil they are trying to achieve.

Tarek Fatah, ostensibly a brave fighter against that false distinction which is called Radical Islam, but who equivocates about the true nature of mainstream Islam. Taqiyya?

There is much of worth to say about Tarek Fatah; but, one should always take him with a grain of salt. He is indeed a decade’s long fighter against radical Islam (Islamofascism) but he insists that what he imagines to be the 'authentic' religion of Islam, its alleged prophet Mohamed and its Holy Book, the Quran, is a genuine religion and it is distinct from radical Islam. This insistence despite the overwhelming evidence of the essentially political and ideological nature of even so-called mainstream Islam as it continues to pose an existential threat to the entire civilized world. Indeed major Islamic leaders and politicians have contradicted Tarek's schizophrenic view of Islam. Recep Erdogan, Turkey's Prime Minister, said that claims about the distinction between radical Islam and mainstream or moderate Islam are at best erroneous. There is only Islam. Keep in mind that Prime Minister Erdogan is a notorious Islamist but he does not equivocate about the nature of Islam and its ultimate agenda. Likewise, President Al Sisi of Egypt, recently addressed Islamic scholars at Al-Azhar University (the epicenter of Sunni Islam scholarship) and called for a major reform of Islamic sacred (so-called) texts. Among other things, Al Sisi said that the “corpus of [Islamic] texts and ideas that we have sacralised over the centuries” are “antagonizing the entire world”; that it is not “possible that 1.6 billion people [reference to the world’s Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants—that is 7 billion—so that they themselves may live”; and that Egypt (or the Islamic world in its entirety) “is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost—and it is being lost by our own hands.” Tarek however continues to deny the essentially radical and corrosive nature of mainstream Islam despite what is common knowledge in the Islamic world. Much like the “Liar-in-Chief”, Barack Hussein Obama. Do we detect a pattern here? Also, as a committed Leftist, Fatah persists in a schizophrenic worldview. He has criticized the Obama administration on many occasions for their pro-Islamist agenda, on the well documented infection of the Muslim Brotherhood in the White House and their effect on foreign policy and the wording of national security documents; but, then, on the other hand, he supported Obama’s Presidency as well as his re-election. Hello? Methinks that our good friend Tarek doth equivocate. He speaks with a forked-tongue. Taqiyya? As a Canadian voter Tarek votes for the NDP which are often to the left of the U.S. Democrats (if that can be believed) and essentially socialistic in their political agenda. The NDP, like the fatuous Obama administration, are also soft on the Islamists and are more inclined to engage and appease Islamic extremism than to fight against it. In conclusion, if you want to hear some hard facts and some valid insights about the nature of that false distinction called radical Islam, Tarek Fatah can be of assistance, but if you are looking for a completely honest, committed and consistent fighter against that deadly malevolence which is mainstream Islam, its true nature and its endemic agenda to overrun the civilized world and drag us all back into darkness, you had better look elsewhere. http://www.therebel.media/tarek_fatah_this_isn_t_about_shia_vs_sunni

Michelle Malkin correctly points out that Obama's weaselly claim that "You didn't built that" is both "historically ignorant and cynically demagogic".

When it comes to getting to where he is through other people's help, Obama literally wrote the book on it. Clearly Obama believes that because he (unlike all other Presidential candidates), was not properly vetted by the sycophantic media; because he was was carried through Harvard and other academic institutions for which he has yet to provide his transcripts; and because his 2008 election and particularly his 2012 re-election (after four years of gross incompetence) was won for him by Senior Strategist David Axelrod, that everyone else is as weak, deceitful and as dependent on others as him. "You didn't build that" was his 2012 campaign slogan. According to Michelle Malkin (whose new book "Who built that?", has become a bestseller), Obama's weaselly claim that "You didn't build that" is both "historically ignorant and cynically demagogic". I cannot agree more. http://www.c-span.org/video/?326060-4/washington-journal-michelle-malkin-built&live

Left wing Australian loons were actually offended because Australian PM, Tony Abbot, called the ISIS Death Cult, A Death Cult. You truly cannot make stuff this absurd up.

I would be attempted to laugh out loud about the absurdity of idiots on the Left actually being offended about ISIS the death cult, being called a death cult, if the existence and the actions of ISIS were not so horrific. Equally, if such absurd and dangerous far Left thinking had not infected Canada and the U.S. as well. Between the demented Left and the psychopathic Islamic terrorists we are truly cursed with an implacable evil in our current time. God help us, or rather, Pray to God, but keep your powder dry. http://www.therebel.media/leftists_offended_after_australian_pm_calls_isis_a_death_cult

The Dhimmi writer, Michael Ondattje, and the far Left liberal establishment he epitomizes, heralds the end of freedom and full human rights in the West, by cowardly refusing to honor Charlie Hepdo at the PEN awards.

Every system carries within it the seeds of its own destruction. The knee-jerk Dhimmi Michael Ondaatje and the far Left liberal establishment he epitomizes, represent the end of the classical liberal values of full human rights including free speech in the Democratic West. Curious enough, Charlie Hepdo is a liberal publication, but in the best classical sense of the word, in that they have the courage of their convictions and the willingness to put their lives on the line to protect the freedoms of all of us. No honour and no respect shown is too great for this fine and courageous publication. If there was ever was a redundant ideology and a backward, brutal culture that needs criticizing it is Islam and Islamic culture. Michael Ondaatje is a disgrace to his profession and in a just society, would be stripped of his Canadian citizenship and repatriated back to Sri Lanka. http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/2015/04/26/michael-ondaatje-withdraws-from-gala-to-protest-honour-for-charlie-hebdo.htmlE

Is Sally Kohn, the gay, moral and gender relativist, threatening the mental and gender stability of her young daughter, who sadly, has been entrusted to her care?

A recent article in the 'Daily Caller' states that Sally Kohn, a gay woman raising a daughter whom she hopes will also turn out gay, is a CNN contributor, an uber liberal network I rarely, if ever watch. She is also a Fox News contributor, on which I have seen her many times, particularly on panel discussion on 'Hannity'. I have always wondered what this 'smarmy', self-important woman, with her fixed, condescending, superior-to-thou, smirk, her cold eyes and her hard Left opinions on most issues, was doing on the conservative FNN; but, no doubt it was FNN striving to be "fair, balanced and unafraid". I had always suspected, in disinterested and casual observation, that she, with her 'boyish' and 'butch' short tousled hair cut and her uber liberalism and feminism was 'gay'; but, I was really not interested enough to care or find out. Today's article provided me with far more information about her than I cared to know. It is sad that a woman with her jaded, morally relativistic, opinions about sexuality and gender identity is legally allowed to raise a daughter who she hopes will 'also turn out gay'. In another time and place, which was less morally relative and confused, her attitudes to child rearing would be considered child abuse and dealt with accordingly. http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/22/cnn-contributor-im-gay-and-i-want-my-kid-to-be-gay-too/?EL.fb